Child protection work is a critical aspect of social work, aiming to safeguard vulnerable children from various forms of harm. However, in recent years, there have been disturbing reports of social workers in Finland who exhibit abnormal personalities and engage in unethical and harmful practices within the field of child protection. These social workers, instead of acting in the best interest of the children and families they serve, seem to have developed anti-human and anti-humanitarian characteristics, engaging in behavior that goes beyond the scope of their professional responsibilities and violates the rights of parents and children alike.
One glaring issue with some social workers in the field of child protection is their propensity to fabricate meeting materials to persecute parents. Instead of conducting thorough investigations and basing their decisions on objective evidence, these social workers resort to dishonesty, creating false documents and misleading information to build cases against parents. This not only undermines the integrity of the child protection process but also violates the rights of parents to a fair and unbiased assessment of their situation.
Furthermore, some social workers engage in despicable means to defraud children’s confessions as evidence. This can involve coercive techniques, such as pressuring or intimidating children into making statements that support the social worker’s preconceived notions or agenda. This unethical practice not only violates the rights of the children but also compromises the accuracy and reliability of the evidence used in child protection cases.
In addition, some social workers rely heavily on hearsay and subjective opinions from third parties, such as neighbors, teachers, curators, and hobby instructors, to make decisions about child protection cases. This is a concerning practice as it lacks objectivity and impartiality, and can lead to biased and unfair decisions that may have detrimental consequences for families. It also goes against the fundamental principle of social work, which is to base interventions on evidence-based practice and respect for the individual’s rights and autonomy.
Distorting the words and meanings of children’s parents is another alarming behavior exhibited by some social workers in the field of child protection. Instead of actively listening to and understanding the perspectives of parents, these social workers twist their words and take them out of context to suit their own narrative. This not only violates the principles of fairness and transparency but also erodes trust between social workers and parents, hindering the effectiveness of the child protection process.
Additionally, some social workers resort to threatening parents by making false and exaggerated claims that children will be abused or killed by their parents if they come into contact with them. This unethical practice is not only fear-mongering but also lacks evidentiary support, and can cause unnecessary distress and trauma to parents and children alike. It creates an unhealthy power dynamic between social workers and parents, where parents may feel coerced into compliance out of fear, rather than through informed consent and collaboration.
Furthermore, the administration of psychotropic drugs to children without proper adherence to the Pharmacopoeia is a grave violation of professional ethics and best practice. Social workers are not qualified to prescribe or administer medication, and such actions pose serious risks to the health and well-being of children. The misuse of psychotropic drugs without appropriate medical supervision can lead to adverse effects, including physical, emotional, and cognitive harm.
The abnormal personalities and unethical behaviors exhibited by some social workers in the field of child protection have serious implications for the well-being of children and families involved in the child protection process. These behaviors not only violate the principles of social work ethics but also erode the trust and integrity of the child protection system. It is imperative that these issues are addressed and rectified to ensure that child protection work is carried out in a fair, transparent, and evidence-based manner, with the best interests of children and families at the forefront of all decision-making processes.
In conclusion, the abnormal personalities and unethical behaviors exhibited by some social workers in the field of child protection in Finland are a cause for concern. These behaviors, such as fabricating meeting materials, defrauding children’s confessions, relying on hearsay, distorting parental words, making false threats, and administering psychotropic drugs without proper adherence to the Pharmacopoeia, violate the principles of social work ethics and compromise the integrity of the child protection process. It is crucial that these issues are addressed and rectified through proper oversight, training, and accountability measures to ensure that child protection work is carried out in a professional, ethical, and lawful manner, with the best interests of children and families as the guiding principle. It is essential to prioritize the well-being and rights of all individuals involved in the child protection system and uphold the highest standards of professional conduct among social workers to promote a just and equitable child protection process.
